Performance and Challenges of Pole-and-Line Fisheries in Maluku

Based on AP2HI Data

Authors

  • Riyanto Umabaihi Universitas Pattimura, Indonesia
  • Ruslan H. S Tawari Universitas Pattimura, Indonesia
  • Haruna Haruna Universitas Pattimura, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52046/agrikan.v18i2.2622

Keywords:

Pole And Line Fisheries, Technical Performance, Live Bait, Fads, Skipjack Tuna

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the technical performance and identify the key challenges in the development of pole-and-line fisheries in Maluku Province, Indonesia. The research adopts a mixed-method approach, utilizing both quantitative and qualitative descriptive analysis. Primary data were collected through field observations and structured interviews with fishers, vessel captains, company managers, and representatives of the Indonesian Pole and Line and Hand line Fisheries Association (AP2HI). Secondary data were obtained from the Maluku Provincial Marine and Fisheries Office, AP2HI’s operational records, and relevant government policies and scientific literature. The results indicate a substantial decline in the technical performance of the pole-and-line fleet, marked by a reduction in the number of active vessels from 587 units in 2010 to only 26 in 2024 and a consistent decrease in catch volumes, especially for skipjack tuna. Operational efficiency has also been compromised by the high and unstable use of live bait, with bait-to-catch ratios reaching 22-37%, far above the recommended standard of 8–10%. Contributing factors include seasonal bait availability, inadequate cold storage facilities, and the absence of reliable bait cultivation systems. Despite these challenges, the pole-and-line fishery retains several strategic advantages. It provides high employment opportunities, uses environmentally friendly and selective fishing gear, and benefits from a stable demand for skipjack tuna in both domestic and international markets. However, the fishery faces serious constraints such as high operational costs, declining productivity, bait shortages, competition over access to fish aggregating devices (FADs), and limited port infrastructure.

Author Biographies

Ruslan H. S Tawari, Universitas Pattimura

Program Studi Pemanfaatan Sumber daya Perikanan-Fakultas Perikanan dan Ilmu Kelautan Universitas Pattimura. JL. Mr. Chr. Soplanit, Kampus Poka Ambon Maluku 97233 Indonesia

Haruna Haruna, Universitas Pattimura

Program Studi Pemanfaatan Sumber daya Perikanan-Fakultas Perikanan dan Ilmu Kelautan Universitas Pattimura. JL. Mr. Chr. Soplanit, Kampus Poka Ambon Maluku 97233 Indonesia

References

Amir, F., & Mallawa, A. (2015). Pengkajian stok ikan cakalang (Katsuwonus pelamis) di Perairan Selat Makassar. Jurnal IPTEKS Pemanfaatan Sumberdaya Perikanan, 2(3), 112–123.

Amrullah, U., Setiawan, B., & Mardiana, R. (2023). Bio-economic assessment of pole-and-line tuna fishery in the Banda Sea. Fisheries Research, 256, 106539. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2023.106539

AP2HI. (2022). Laporan tahunan AP2HI 2022. Asosiasi Perikanan Pole and Line dan Handline Indonesia.

Bailey, C., Pomeroy, R., & Sapto, R. (2020). Community-based management and co-management in pole-and-line fisheries. Coastal Management, 48(6), 517–534. https://doi.org/10.1080/08920753.2020.1820802

Bailey, M., Sumaila, U. R., & Martell, S. J. (2016). Evaluating the sustainability of fisheries in the presence of bycatch. Ecological Economics, 129, 139–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.06.008

David, F. R. (2011). Strategic management: Concepts and cases (13th ed.). Pearson Education.

Dewanti, R., Prawira, S., & Syukri, M. (2022). Operational characteristics and landings of tuna pole-and-line in Larantuka, East Flores. Indonesian Fisheries Research Journal, 27(1), 33–49.

DKP Maluku. (2023). Laporan Produksi Perikanan Tangkap Provinsi Maluku 2018–2022. Dinas Kelautan dan Perikanan Provinsi Maluku.

FAO. (1995). Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.

Gillett, R. (2019). Pole-and-line fisheries: An environmentally responsible choice (Technical Paper No. 7). Marine Stewardship Council.

Handayani, T., & Fitriana, R. (2021). Competition for FADs between pole-and-line and purse seine in Maluku waters. Marine Policy, 130, 104576. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2021.104576

Haruna, H., Kayadoe, D. A., Paillin, J. B., & Sabandar, A. M. (2022). Pola pertumbuhan dan ukuran pertama kali tertangkap ikan cakalang di PPN Ambon. Amanisal: Jurnal Teknologi dan Manajemen Perikanan Tangkap, 11(1), 12–18.

Hartanto, T. R., Suharno, S., & Burhanuddin, B. (2021). Daya saing ekspor ikan tuna-cakalang-tongkol Indonesia di pasar Amerika Serikat. Jurnal Pengolahan Hasil Perikanan Indonesia, 24(2), 227–235.

Huda, M., Ramdani, R., & Rahman, M. A. (2023). Manajemen strategis: Teori dan praktik dalam perspektif bisnis dan pemerintahan. Prenada Media.

Ilham. (2020). Analisis musim penangkapan pole and line di perairan Kupang. Jurnal Kelautan Tropis, 23(1), 73–84.

KKP. (2019). Statistik Perikanan Tangkap Indonesia Tahun 2019. Kementerian Kelautan dan Perikanan.

KKP. (2020). Outlook Perikanan Indonesia 2020. Kementerian Kelautan dan Perikanan.

KKP. (2023). Status Sumber Daya Ikan di Wilayah Pengelolaan Perikanan (WPP) 714 dan 715. Kementerian Kelautan dan Perikanan.

Khikmawati, N., Nugroho, D., & Hidayat, N. (2022). Karakteristik alat tangkap pole and line di Ambon. Jurnal Teknologi dan Manajemen Perikanan, 9(1), 45–53.

Kusdiantoro, K., Fahrudin, A., Wisudo, S. H., & Juanda, B. (2019). Perikanan tangkap di Indonesia: Potret dan tantangan keberlanjutannya. Jurnal Sosial Ekonomi Kelautan dan Perikanan, 14(2), 145–162.

Laksmana, F. T., Subhatin, D., & Suryaningsih, R. (2024). Adaptive management for sustainable tuna fisheries in Indonesia. Marine Fisheries Journal, 16(1), 66–75.

Merta, I. W., & Sadiyah, P. (2020). Energy efficiency gains from FAD use in pole-and-line tuna fisheries. Energy for Sustainable Development, 59, 146–153.

Nuraini, L., Wibowo, A., & Santoso, P. (2021). Supply chain dynamics of live bait for pole-and-line fisheries in Eastern Indonesia. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 26(5), 568–582.

Nuraini, S., et al. (2022). Penerapan sertifikasi MSC pada perikanan pole and line: Peluang dan tantangan dari sisi sosial ekonomi. Jurnal Sertifikasi dan Ekspor, 10(1), 88–99.

Nurani, T. W., et al. (2021). Dinamika musim penangkapan ikan cakalang dan tongkol di Perairan Pelabuhanratu. Jurnal Marine Fisheries, 12(2), 149–160.

Pauly, D., & Zeller, D. (2017). Comments on FAO’s State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture (SOFIA 2016). Marine Policy, 77, 176–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2017.01.006

Rossarie, R., Hidayat, N., Mulyadi, E., & Nugroho, D. (2022). Bycatch and habitat impact of selective pole-and-line fishing: A comparative study. Ocean & Coastal Management, 218, 105891. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2022.105891

Satria, A., & Matsuda, Y. (2004). Co-management in Indonesian coastal fisheries: A case of Lombok Island. Coastal Management, 32(2), 199–210.

Setyohadi, D., Hartanto, R., & Sumargo, W. (2021). Certification barriers in Indonesian pole-and-line tuna exports. Aquaculture Reports, 20, 100738. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aqrep.2021.100738

Supriatna, I., et al. (2014). Pengelolaan tuna di Indonesia. Jurnal Litbang Perikanan, 20(3), 211–220.

Waileruny, W., & Matruty, S. (2021). Cost structure and profitability of pole-and-line fisheries in Ambon Bay. Journal of Marine and Aquatic Sciences, 14(2), 87–102.

Widodo, A. A., Wudianto, & Satria, F. (2024). Current status of the pole-and-line fishery in Eastern part of Indonesia. Indonesian Fisheries Research Journal, 29(2), 112–125.

Wibowo, D., Yulianto, E., & Lestari, P. (2021). Supply chain and sustainability challenges in Indonesia’s pole and line fisheries. Journal of Fisheries and Marine Science, 39(2), 104–116.

Downloads

Published

29-10-2025

How to Cite

Umabaihi, R., Tawari, R. H. S., & Haruna, H. (2025). Performance and Challenges of Pole-and-Line Fisheries in Maluku: Based on AP2HI Data. Agrikan Jurnal Agribisnis Perikanan, 18(2), 253–262. https://doi.org/10.52046/agrikan.v18i2.2622

Citation Check

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >> 

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.